Reading · for Viewpoints
Reading
Read the following article.

When Nanaimo won a large provincial grant to redevelop a long-derelict stretch of its industrial waterfront, few residents expected the money to provoke such a bitter public controversy. The council has narrowed a lengthy list of submissions down to two very different visions, and it must now determine which one deserves the funding. The first proposal calls for a large open-air amphitheatre capable of hosting touring concerts and summer festivals, while the second would divide the identical ground into a patchwork of community gardens, small plazas, and shaded gathering spaces. Alicia Fenwick, who chairs the redevelopment committee, maintains that whichever way the vote falls, the finished waterfront should draw residents back to a neglected quarter of the city that they have deliberately avoided for the better part of a generation.

Devlin Roache, whose events company would bid to run the venue, makes no secret of his conviction that the grant belongs to the amphitheatre. A signature performance space, he contends, would establish Nanaimo firmly on the national touring circuit and attract precisely the travellers who currently drive straight past the community on their way toward larger centres. "A garden is a pleasant enough thing," Roache concedes, "but it will never fill a hotel room or a restaurant table on a rainy Tuesday in November. One busy summer of headline acts would do more for local businesses than a decade of vegetable plots, and the benefit would spread to every shop downtown."

Premium practice

Already a member? Sign in

1This article is mainly about
Athe advantages of community gardens over a concert venue.
Bhow difficult it is to redevelop an old industrial waterfront.
Ca disagreement over how a public grant should be spent.
Dthe steady decline of Nanaimo's downtown shops.
2Roache argues that, compared with the gardens, an amphitheatre would
Acost far less to keep up each year.
Bbe used every single day by local residents.
Craise the value of the property nearby.
Dbring far more money to local businesses.
3Roache backs the amphitheatre partly because he expects it to
Adraw in visitors who now drive straight past the city.
Bgive the city's young people somewhere to go.
Cserve mainly the people who already live nearby.
Dsit empty for much of the year.
4Okafor claims that a concert venue would
Abe used every single day by residents.
Bhelp newcomers get to know their neighbours.
Cserve outsiders who leave once the show ends.
Dcost only a fraction of what the gardens require.
5Okafor says council is too quick to overlook
Athe crowds a summer festival would draw.
Bthe rise in nearby property values that gardens can bring.
Cthe upkeep a concert hall demands.
Dthe needs of the touring performers.
6Fenwick insists the final decision must rest on
Athe returns any single company stands to gain.
Bwhich vision would fill the most hotel rooms.
Cthe needs of the whole city over the long term.
Dthe wishes of the garden volunteers.
0 of 6 completed