Reading · for Viewpoints
Reading
Read the following article.

Renata Vann is a social studies teacher at Cedar Ridge Secondary who believes that genuine inquiry should encourage critical thinking, even if doing so means questioning what is printed in the textbook. Part of the curriculum deals with how the first peoples reached the Americas, and Vann was dismayed to find the textbook material to be "little more than a settled story, which claims that the earliest arrivals walked south through an ice-free corridor between the glaciers."

Vann argues that education is supposed to teach students to weigh evidence for themselves, yet textbooks often privilege certain viewpoints and present them as the only truth. In the case of the first migration, she was troubled to find that no other route was so much as mentioned. "The absence of any alternative suggests that this subject has hardened into a kind of orthodoxy that leaves no room for honest debate," Vann says.

Premium practice

Already a member? Sign in

1According to the article, Ms. Vann's main goal is to
Amake sure students have memorized the textbook content.
Bchallenge well-established educational publishers.
Cteach only about the overland crossing.
Dencourage students to weigh competing explanations.
2Ms. Vann's view of textbooks is that
Athey reflect research funded by private companies.
Bthey tend to favour certain viewpoints as the only truth.
Cthey promote low-quality work with no credibility.
Dthey exaggerate the importance of the coastal route.
3In addition to the conventional account, Ms. Vann teaches that
Athe first peoples may have come by sea along the coast.
Bthe land bridge never actually existed.
Cthe ice-free corridor was the only possible way in.
Dthe Americas were never reached from Asia at all.
4Mr. Frey is concerned that Ms. Vann's approach
Arisks muddling what her students understand.
Btreats the overland crossing as a settled story.
Cleaves no room for the conventional account.
Ddenies that the excavations took place.
5Ms. Vann responds to her colleagues by
Ainsisting that the land bridge played no part at all.
Bquestioning her colleagues' knowledge of archaeology.
Carguing that more than one explanation belongs in the classroom.
Dpointing out how much her students enjoy the class.
6Ms. Vann believes that schools
Ashould not hire underqualified teachers.
Bshould teach more than one explanation of a topic.
Cshould abandon a fixed curriculum entirely.
Dshould teach students about the funding of research.
0 of 6 completed