Reading · for Viewpoints
Reading
Read the following article.

Contactless cards and app-based payment systems have swept through nearly every corner of Canadian commercial life. Physical cash has all but vanished from ordinary wallets, cash registers no longer rattle with coins, and a single tap now settles almost any purchase in an instant. However genuine the convenience may be, the effortless tap, with its painless swipes and its invisible balances quietly shrinking unnoticed, has turned the basic task of tracking one's own spending into a genuinely Herculean undertaking. Younger adults are often presumed to be especially vulnerable, having grown up in a world that never once obliged them to count out banknotes at a retail counter. The widespread impression that cashless payment is loosening our grip on personal finances shows up in the accounts gathered at community budgeting clinics, where seasoned counsellors increasingly report that their clients simply cannot reconstruct where their income went. Yvette Cormier, a veteran credit counsellor in Regina, believes that "the frictionless tap is quietly loosening our sense of restraint," because "people who pay without ever seeing the cash leave their hands are showing diminished discipline, foresight, and awareness of their own habits." In essence, the painless ease of tapping makes it hard for shoppers to notice how much they spend in an ordinary week.

Not everyone is as worried, however, about the move away from cash. Dr. Amrit Sandhu of the University of Guelph agrees that the shift is reshaping the way people handle money, with consequences that might include a looser memory for what they spend, but he claims that unloading this mental bookkeeping is actually "valuable for busy people whose attention is better spent on more demanding work." He surmises that consumers are simply adapting to the tools that their surroundings place in front of them.

Premium practice

Already a member? Sign in

1The author's main purpose in this article is to
Adescribe the history of paper money.
Bpraise the convenience that tap-to-pay offers.
Cpresent differing views on how cashless payment affects people.
Dwarn that young adults are overspending.
2Ms. Cormier's view is based mainly on her
Atraining in personal finance.
Bobservations over the years.
Cresearch on spending habits.
Down money troubles.
3Dr. Sandhu suggests that consumers
Acan no longer budget at all.
Bshould give up cashless payment.
Care wholly unaffected by tapping.
Dare adapting to the tools around them.
4Ms. Cormier is concerned that
Acashless payment may weaken shoppers' discipline and awareness.
Bcashless payment may raise overall savings.
Cspending records can improve budgeting.
Dshoppers can multitask thanks to tapping.
5Dr. Fournier believes that
Athe effects of cashless payment deserve more study.
Bcashless payment can harm our memory for spending.
Ccashless payment can widen access for anxious people.
Dshoppers need the ease of a quick tap.
6The most positive view of cashless payment belongs to
Athe author
BMs. Cormier
CDr. Sandhu
DDr. Fournier
0 of 6 completed