Reading · for Viewpoints
Reading
Read the following article.

Saving the Old Seeds

The numbers are clear, and what they point to is troubling. Of the many thousands of distinct vegetable and grain varieties that Canadian gardeners and farmers once cultivated, a large share are now planted by almost no one. With each passing decade, a further portion of them disappears from the fields for good. As a small set of modern, commercially bred cultivars come to dominate the country's farms, the loss of these inherited varieties shows little sign of slowing. Supporters of seed conservation, a movement that has lately acquired real institutional weight, maintain that preserving even one endangered variety helps safeguard a community's irreplaceable connection to its own farming heritage. Several provincial governments have begun subsidizing community seed libraries. Officials, though, continue to weigh the trade-offs with obvious caution. The genuinely difficult question now facing policymakers is how far public money should underwrite crops that the market has largely left behind.

Premium practice

Already a member? Sign in

1Bélanger is mainly concerned about
Ainflated claims about what seed conservation achieves.
Bdeciding which strain of a variety is the true one.
Cpublicly funded schemes that preserve seeds for political credit.
Ddenials about how fast the older kinds are vanishing.
2Voss suggests that farmers who set an old variety aside may be
Adestroying flavour and hardiness for good.
Bsafeguarding the community's link to its past.
Cmaking a sensible modern choice.
Dchasing the political credit of a conservation story.
3The two people most skeptical about publicly funded preservation are
ABélanger and the CHST.
BAshworth and Bélanger.
CVoss and Bélanger.
DAshworth and Voss.
4Voss's view implies that some farmers
Acan gain by planting a modern cultivar.
Blose an irreplaceable variety the moment they switch.
Cdeserve public funding for their whole seed library.
Dcarry the family story bound up in the seed.
5Overall, the article presents seed preservation as
Arejected because farmers dislike the old varieties.
Bclearly justified by the loss of the older kinds.
Cessential to every single community's identity.
Da hard question with no settled answer.
6Compared with Ashworth, Voss's stance toward publicly funded preservation is more
Aenthusiastic about the schemes.
Bindifferent to the losses.
Cuncertain about the seeds.
Dopenly doubtful.
0 of 6 completed