What is CELPIP Reading Part 4?
You read an opinion article, then a reader's comment responding to it. The questions come in two halves.
| Questions | Time | Format |
|---|---|---|
| 10 (5 on the article, 5 blanks in the reader comment) | ~13 minutes | Multiple choice + drop-down blanks |
It gets the most time of any Reading part, and it needs it: this is the part where the text carries opinion, nuance and disagreement rather than plain information.
How CELPIP Reading Part 4 is scored
One point per question, computer-scored, no penalty for guessing, from a Reading total of 38 scored questions. At 10 questions, Part 4 is the second-largest block on the paper.
For context on what those points are worth: Paragon's official score table puts CELPIP Level 9 at 31 to 33 correct answers out of 38. Note that the official bands overlap, so treat published conversion tables with care, including ones that claim 33 to 35 correct equals Level 9.
Why CELPIP Reading Part 4 is the hardest part
Because it holds two opinions in tension, and the questions are built on the gap between them. The article makes a case. The reader's comment responds: sometimes agreeing in part, sometimes disagreeing, sometimes accepting the facts but rejecting the conclusion.
The classic wrong answer here attributes to one writer a view actually held by the other, or hands back a view that the article raised specifically in order to reject it. Keeping the two voices separate is the whole task.
CELPIP Reading Part 4 strategies
- Establish the article's position in one sentence before you read a single question. If you cannot state it, you cannot answer questions about it.
- Then establish how the commenter differs. Do they reject the argument, or accept it and push further? That relationship generates the questions.
- Watch for views raised in order to be dismissed. "Some argue that..." is not the author's belief, and options that hand it back as their belief are the manufactured trap.
- For the five comment blanks, keep the commenter's stance consistent. The right word is usually the one that keeps their argument coherent, not merely the one that is grammatical.
- Use the full ~13 minutes. It is the longest part for a reason.
Common CELPIP Reading Part 4 mistakes
- Attributing the commenter's view to the article's author or the reverse. The defining Part 4 error.
- Taking a straw man as a real position. A view introduced so it can be knocked down is not a view held.
- Arriving out of time. Part 4 comes last, so if Parts 1 to 3 ran hot, this is where the damage lands, on the part with the most questions and the most nuance.
