Reading · for Viewpoints
Reading
Read the following article.

When the City of Saskatoon began posting colour-coded hygiene grades in restaurant windows this week and listing every eatery in a public online ranking, diners, cooks, councillors, and owners quickly split into opposing camps over whether the grades belong in the window at all. The louder complaints came from the kitchens rather than the customers: most diners who were asked welcomed the grades, whose scores feed a public list that orders every restaurant in the city from cleanest to worst. Delia Marchetti, whose family eats out most weekends, is firmly in favour and studies the list closely. "I pay for these inspections through my taxes, so naturally I should be able to look them up.

My children deserve the safest kitchen in town, and our usual spot is slipping down the list, so I have my eye on the place across the street instead." Warren Okonkwo, the city's chief environmental health officer, admits he is not entirely at ease ordering his inspectors to slap a grade in every window, though he accepts that diners are owed clear figures on how a kitchen performs, so long as no one twists those figures to set a tiny family kitchen against a large chain. "What the grading really gives us is hard numbers, and numbers are how we hold an operator answerable to the public. Take away the record of what an inspector found, and we have no honest way of knowing whether a kitchen is meeting the standards the law demands."

Premium practice

Already a member? Sign in

1Ms. Lund's main objection to the grades is that they
Areward the steady, unseen habits that keep food safe.
Breflect the care a kitchen takes on every day of the year.
Ccapture only a single inspection and miss the daily practice.
Dmark down large chains over minor technicalities.
2The eatery with the highest grade in the article is
AMs. Lund's bistro.
BMs. Marchetti's usual spot.
CMr. Fanshawe's diner.
Dthe place across the street.
3Mr. Okonkwo believes the main value of the grading is to
Aset a family kitchen against a large chain.
Bgive the public solid facts and hold operators answerable.
Cput a grade in every restaurant window.
Ddecide which kitchen is the tidiest.
4Mr. Okonkwo thinks the figures should not be
Atwisted to pit a small kitchen against a big chain.
Bshared with the paying public.
Cdrawn from what an inspector found.
Dused to hold operators answerable.
5Mr. Fanshawe regards the money spent on the grading program as
Aessential to keeping food safe.
Ba fair reward for the busiest districts.
Cbetter spent on inspectors and training.
Dproof that newer kitchens score higher.
6At present, Mr. Fanshawe is on the verge of
Adisplaying the sticker as required.
Bpraising the public ranking.
Cstaging his kitchen for the inspector.
Drefusing to put the grade in his window.
0 of 6 completed