Reading · for Viewpoints
Reading
Read the following article.

A recent string of high-profile food recalls over the past year has directed renewed attention to the question of food safety across Canada. At issue is the safety of the many perishable products that move through the country's grocery networks every day. A number of experts now warn that, unless decisive steps are taken to tighten contamination controls, public confidence in the modern food-supply system could be undermined. "These past months have been genuinely unsettling for a great many people throughout the industry," said Colette Bergeron, a federal food-policy analyst. "Shoppers read the alarming headlines and at once picture a tainted product arriving in their own kitchen, which can undo years of a company's careful work and, in the worst cases, send people to hospital.

We have reached a point where many are questioning the entire industrial approach to feeding a country, and I admit that I understand their worry. Once you see how many products were pulled, and how large the companies responsible for them were, a sense of unease is hard to shake. For a small family farm that sells directly to its neighbours, sticking to old, local methods and trusting what you can see with your own eyes can begin to look remarkably sensible."

Premium practice

Already a member? Sign in

1According to Ravi Menon, testing labs and monitoring firms have
Alet go of skilled staff.
Bbeen struggling financially.
Cbeen behind the recalls themselves.
Dseen a rise in business.
2Colette Bergeron suggests that a small local farm might conclude that
Athe modern food supply is a risky thing to rely on.
Bthe headlines have overstated the danger.
Csmall producers are less likely to be affected.
Dthe government must shut down the large firms.
3Grace Okafor believes that most of the recalls
Aare blown out of proportion by the media.
Bprove that testing labs cannot keep up.
Ccome from ordinary, avoidable mistakes.
Dtend to strike small farms first.
4Ravi Menon argues that the high-profile recalls
Aharm the food industry over time.
Bcost very little to put right.
Chave drawn too little public attention.
Dare good for testing and monitoring companies.
5Colette Bergeron reports that the recalls have
Abrought back local farming everywhere.
Bbecome easier to fix in a systematic way.
Craised doubts about the modern way of feeding a country.
Dcaused the food industry to hit a wall.
6The people quoted in the article are best described as
Aelected federal ministers
Bspecialists in food and its supply
Cretired grocery workers
Dwell-known advertising consultants
7Reading the line "Once you take in how many products were pulled... a sense of unease is hard to shake," a reader could best continue with
AIt is fortunate, then, that
BShe is quite right to claim that
CSo it is small wonder that
DThis holds true even as
8Grace Okafor is mainly concerned with
Akeeping food safe to eat
Bselling contamination-testing kits
Cpublicizing recent recalls
Dmarketing cold-chain technology
9Compared with Ravi Menon, Grace Okafor's view is best introduced with the phrase
AIn contrast to
BBuilding on the point made by
CEchoing
DIn agreement with
10Grace Okafor suggests the most useful tool against contamination is
ATesting labs
BStaff training
CElaborate systems
DCold-chain monitors
0 of 10 completed